Comment: Swap requirements not met. 19/12/12 UPDATED The parcel itself arrived safely and there were 25 gifts. I am updating my rating from a 5 to a 3 after unwrapping all of my gifts. After giving Michelle the opportunity via pm to consider my concern about the quality of the swap I am rating a 3. This was a profile based swap except for 6 Christmas item gifts. I don’t give part packets of lollies as gifts, or miniscule amounts of things I have taken out of packages. I don’t believe that an EXPENSIVE swap as it is listed as would contain 3 pieces of card less than atc sized as 1 gift. Paying more than 11.40 postage is hardly justification for anything. WE ALL paid more than that for postage. Mine cost over $24 to post and that was in 2 separate parcels. It was listed as an EXPENSIVE swap. I may have still rated a 5 with no comment until I received rude responses with $#$@ profanity in them to my email, jumping to conclusions and making assumptions about whom I shared my swap with before deciding that it didn’t meet the criteria and practically accusing me of having an untoward agenda regarding it. Remote area is hardly a justification considering things can be bought online and posted in. EVERYONE with a pc and the internet can shop!. A crap swap is a CRAP swap! I am rating fairly and honestly. If I was looking for an easy way out to just rate you a 3, I would rate you down for not sending a tracking number and wrapping the 25th present specially as was required. Swap criteria not met. I am glad as swap host that I got you as a partner otherwise I may well have had a bigger problem on my hand trying to mediate the terms profile based and expensive with participants.